michaelmacal.com

Michael Macal's personal WordPress weblog.

Archive

Category: Technology

speed

This site is using the premium virtual server package from GoDaddy.com. It seems to be rather slow compared to a year ago, but I don’t have any metrics to back that up. I think that their virtual load-balancing currently causes severe variability in performance. Here is some data from a recent speed test. Is this good?

Load times for http://michaelmacal.com/blog from http://WebWait.com during non-peak weekend time (Sat @ 8:45pm):

Average: 8.16s. Median: 3.97s. StdDev: 4.935s. From 30 calls.
[1] 6.78s
[2] 4.85s
[3] 7.38s
[4] 3.25s
[5] 8.66s
[6] 10.76s
[7] 6.19s
[8] 11.92s
[9] 20.14s
[10] 24.95s
[11] 10.09s
[12] 7.99s
[13] 3.38s
[14] 3.24s
[15] 7.19s
[16] 13.63s
[17] 3.52s
[18] 4.18s
[19] 3.63s
[20] 4.14s
[21] 5.41s
[22] 4.93s
[23] 14.38s
[24] 4.64s
[25] 3.01s
[26] 7.10s
[27] 3.29s
[28] 4.59s
[29] 5.28s
[30] 3.04s

  • Share/Bookmark

Strange. Testing against PHX server gives low ping, fast upload, low bandwidth. Scottsdale give high ping, okay upload, high bandwidth. What’s up with that? Tested from a MacBook + Airport Extreme N Router, + SB5120 modem. the last test is from my iPhone. Actually pretty impressive for a little device. It had a faster upload then the 2nd laptop test!

MacBook on WAN – Phoenix

MacBook on WAN – Scottsdale

MacBook on LAN – Scottsdale

iPhone on WAN – Scottsdale

  • Share/Bookmark


MacBook 802.11N @ 58% Signal Strength


PS3 802.11G @ 70% Signal Strength


PS3 Ethernet

So what is going on here. Downloads directly from PS3 network are VERY slow. A quick check on speedtest.net shows that while the PS3 is slower than my laptop, scoring half the bandwidth, it still should be tooling around at descent internet speeds. Even still, downloads from the store, including the system updates are painfully slow other wireless.

You would assume that the Sony network is the culprit but when I put a direct Ethernet connection for the PS3, downloads suddenly pick up about an order of magnitude faster.

The router is the Apple Airport Extreme N. The connection check from the PS3 indicates correctly that UPnP is not supported and detects NAT Type 2 routing. Using DMZ port forwarding does not change the transfer speed when using the wireless connection.

Does the store do something differently? I guess only something like Wireshark will tell. Maybe I will packet sniff this weekend to see if I can find the issue. I have seen many posts complaining about wireless + store download speed issues so I know that I’m not alone. My old router would not even create a working wireless connection with the PS3 even though everything looked proper. Oh well. If you know of a possible solution drop me a line.

  • Share/Bookmark

I wanted to recap some amazing new technology advancements made recently with lasers. While you may have heard research of lasers as interconnects on microprocessors or being used in ultra bright high contrast TVs, some of these stories reveal how much more there is to discover from light and lasers.
 

10/02/2008
The search gets closer to a cheap universal laser that can operate at many different frequencies due to a new optical fiber material. Red, blue, green, and everything in between. The new material is an order of magnitude better than previous materials and stands to benefit medical, military, and industry.

http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml;?articleID=210605464

08/04/2008
X-ray laser resolves 50 nm holography CCD photography using method involving pinholes. Resulting 3D images can show detailed scans of objects like a single bacterium.

http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=209902697

07/29/2008
Lasers produced without need of lens straight on die. Emerging technology will allow for new applications of much smaller laser systems. Eventually it may be possible for plasmonic structures to replace the lens and be a fully collimated laser.

http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=209800332

05/08/2008
Extra-solar planetary detection technique offers three to four magnitudes of order more powerful using specifically frequency tuned comb approach to measure ranges from 400 to 1100 nm.

http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml;?articleID=207601057

Links:
Lasers section here: http://www.physicstoday.org/
Particles section here: http://www.aip.org/png/
Laser Search here: http://www.eetimes.com/

  • Share/Bookmark

A Look at Hybrid Cars

 

     So I have a 2008 Toyota Prius. It is a gadget-geek car that’s an immediate conversation starter with anyone I met. Yes, I get 52 MPG average. Yes, the performance is fine with characteristics similar to most 4 cylinder compact cars. Yes, the batteries are more or less covered by Totoya for the life of the vehicle. The list goes on.

     Some people think it is ugly. I say that the car’s form is just like a wing. It’s a beautiful shape. In fact, the car is the most aerodynamic vehicle out there (besides the Insight which has to skirt it’s back wheels to achieve .01% better drag coefficient). The Prius is around $26k fully loaded out the door and is one of only two real choices out there for efficient hybrids, the other choice being the Honda Civic.  

     So if I’m looking at a hybrid, what is next? What should you wait for? Well, here is a quick list of some interesting real cars that are here or have been confirmed to hit production that might fit the bill. Some information is speculative and with all future cars, they are vaporware until they are actually in a dealership. 

2008 Toyota Prius

  • Compact
  • 48/45 MPG
  • 1.5L 76BHP/67BHP (143 HP)
  • NiMH
  • $26K

2008 Honda Civic

  • Compact
  • 45/40 MPG
  • 1.3L 95BHP/20BHP (115 HP)
  • NiMH
  • $24K

 

2010 Honda Insight

  • Subcompact
  • 50?/46? MPG
  • ?L ?BHP/?BHP (? HP)
  • NiMH
  • $23K

2010 Toyota Prius

  • Compact
  • 55/50 MPG
  • 1.8L 91BHP?/67BHP? (158 HP)
  • NiMH
  • $27k

2011 Chevy Volt

  • Compact
  • 120/113? MPG
  • 1.0L 71BHP/134BHP x 2 (268 HP) (previously reported as 1.4L)
  • NiMH
  • $35K

2012 Honda CR-Z

  • Subcompact coupe
  • ?/? MPG
  • ?L ?BHP/?BHP (? HP)
  • NiMH
  • $30K?

2015 Honda Fit

  • Subcompact
  • ?/? MPG
  • ?L ?BHP/?BHP (? HP)
  • NiMH
  • $25K?

2015 Volvo C30 ReCharge

  • Compact
  • 100?/93? MPG
  • 1.6L 140BHP/70BHP? x 4 (280 HP)
  • Lithium-polymer
  • $28K?
Want to see more hybrid? Check this out: 

 

Batteries

     All batteries for use in vehicles are an interesting subject. Batteries are complex things. Think about any laptops or cell phones that you may have had. You are probably not fond of those memories. They are just a bunch of chemicals in a cell that are controlled by a computer. They have to perform within strict tolerances so as not to overheat, charge fully or deplete fully, or charge too quickly or deplete too quickly. All these thing will eventually kill the battery. The computer is the key to maximizing the life of the battery.

     Consumers should forget about the idea of “fully charging up” the car. The challenge for Chevy and others will be, how to fill up to 60-80% charge for a plugin hybrid or PHEV and still have the vehicle be able to go 40 miles on electric before dropping down to 30-50% battery capacity. At that time, the gas ICE kicks in and starts charging the battery back up. These engineering feats are required to strike that balance between reliability and performance.

     Batteries are made mainly of two completing types, the tested and adopted Nickel-metal hydride (NiMH)  and the obvious candidate, Lithium-ion (Li-ion) / Lithium-Polymer. 

     NiMH can be controlled well and kept under operating thresholds better than Li-ion. Because of this, NiMH has a better lifespan. Li-ion has a better weight-to-energy ratio but overheats more easily and is also more expensive to manufacture for now. It also has a shelf life based on it’s production date, so even having the car parked, the battery will eventually die.

     This trade off will keep hybrids using NiMH for quite awhile until the heat issues (and subsequent explosions) are handled as well as the dropping the cost. This may happen quicker than manufacturers hope, especially since the recent incredible price hike of NiMH and advancing in Lithium research. Perhaps it may be another 8 years until manufactures feel comfortable enough to move towards a Lithium solution.

  • Share/Bookmark

Sharp AQUOS LC-52D82U 52″ LCD TV
1080p
120Hz frame-rate-conversion

Dell S2409W 24″ LCD Monitor
1080p

Scientific Atlanta Explorer 8300HD DVR X2 250 MHz
54 MB
160 GB HD

Onkyo TX-SR505S Home Theater Receiver
Athena AS-P4100 400 watt 10″ Subwoofer
Athena x3 WS-60 150 watt wall-mount speakers
Vanco x2 CP800 100 watt 8″ in ceiling speakers

Samsung DVD V3500 VHS/DVD Player
480p

Samsung DVD HD-755 DVD Player
1080i / 480p upscaling

Philips PET 1002 10″ Portable DVD Player

AudioVox D1917 9″ Portable DVD Player

MacBook 2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
4 GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAM
120 GB HD

Mac Mini 1.42 GHz G4
1 GB 333 MHz DDR SDRAM
80 GB HD

AppleTV
1080p / 720p
160 GB HD

SONY Playstation 3 Game Console
1080p / 720p
80 GB HD

Nindento Wii
480p

Apple Airport Extreme
802.11n
1.5 TB HD
500GB HD (RAID 1)
300 GB HD

HP 2600N Networked Color Laser Printer
16MB

Nikon D5000 DSLR
12.3MP / 720p @ 10Mb
Tamron AF 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Aspherical IF Macro Zoom Lens
8 GB SDHC Class 6

Nikon Coolpix S210 8MP
Fisheye Lens

Aiptek Action HD Camcorder
HDV 1080p / 720p @ 7Mb
8 GB SDHC Class 6

Canon ZR-600 Camcorder
DV

Total TB HD Storage = 2.9 TB

  • Share/Bookmark